Tuesday, April 23, 2013

The burden of rising electricity cost on rent


Nersa have approved an 8% increase in electricity costs, agreeably  not the 16% requested by Eskom never-the-less still above inflation; but when viewed against the previous 25% per annum increases, is this lower increase a little bit too late for most consumers.

TPN’s research indicates residential tenants are already over-exposed to the high cost of electricity.

By way of example, a tenant in a two bedroom townhouse over a 5 year period provides tangible evidence of the rising cost of electricity. In June 2009 Joe’s average monthly cost of electricity was R192.40, this rose year on year to a monthly cost of R202.14 in 2010, R351.07 in 2011, R626.33 in 2012 and R814.70 in 2013.

Joe’s case is not isolated and most consumers would relate personally with this increase pattern.

In fact the cost of electricity has increased so disproportionality with the cost of living that Joe’s electricity cost now makes up 19% of his overall rent and electricity bill compared to only 5% in 2009.

A broader sample of TPN’s Rentbook tenants indicates a similar trend with some noteworthy key findings:

The average cost of a tenant’s electricity in 2011 was R763.39 or 17% of the rent and electricity bill.

In 2012 the average of electricity was R884.06 or 19% of the rent and electricity bill.

Further analysis revealed tenants in the below R3000 rent per month category have been most severely impacted: in 2011 23% of their total rental account was attributed to electricity while in 2012 this pushed up to 30% - effectively the average cost of R622.72 for electricity on an average basic rental of R2250.42.

Both tenants and landlords have already suffered financial consequences and will continue to do so. Tenant’s pockets are directly impacted with the lower end of the renal market suffering the most. The extraordinarily high annual increase of electricity over the last 4 years has directly impacted the landlords ability to increase rent with overall basic rent escalation remain fairly flat. More alarmingly, the landlord remains liable for the cost of electricity on his property; if the tenant defaults on electricity payments, the landlord will have to settle this account prior to obtaining a clearance certificate on any future sale of the property.

The cost of a tenant’s non-payment of electricity is now significant, especially when calculated over the average 12 month term of a lease; it is inevitable that landlords will start demanding higher deposits to cover this risk.

Tenants are responsible to make full and timeous payments for their rent and additional charges such as electricity, it is increasingly important that landlords or their agent perform full TPN credit reports and thorough affordability assessments.

Thursday, December 13, 2012

#Evictions101


Follow our live trial eviction of a habitual delinquent tenant #evictions101.
Follow the storey on twitter: @tpnadvice

Follow the landlord on twitter: @justinbez
Follow the Attorney – Steyn & Steyn: @Cilna

The storey starts in May 2012; Joe*, the tenant (not her real name) spins a heartfelt story to Justin, the landlord of why he should not perform credit checks on her – she admits she does have blackmark but wants to “open and honest”, she has “learnt her lesson” and “promises to be a good tenant”

Naively, Justin takes Joe for her word – the tenant has admitted to being blacklisted, he decides it is unnecessary to perform a credit check on the tenant; “Why bother if the tenant was up-front?”
Now a difficult 6 months later, first Joe paid late (in month one 2 weeks late, in month two and three 3 weeks late, in month four 2 weeks late); but in month 5 and 6 Joe has not paid at all. It’s not that Joe isn’t communicating – she emails Justin regularly with “heartfelt apologies and long sad stories with promises of payment” which are never followed through.

Finally Justin performs the long overdue credit check; clarity sets in. Joe was upfront, she did have a blackmark against her name – in fact she had 11 blackmarks on the one credit bureau, 9 blackmarks on the second credit bureau and 12 months of non-payment of rent culminating in a R48500 default on the TPN rental credit bureau.
Justin acknowledges, had he performed the credit check in May he would never have rented to Joe. Too late. Now he must take action.

The eviction process is quite technical and already a timely process due to legal mandatory time requirements (20 business days to cancel; 14 days to issue summons etc.), Justin is already 2 months down on non-payment of rent, it is the middle of December, the last thing he needs is an attorney who delays the eviction due to non-compliance with the technicalities – a specialist eviction attorney must be sourced:
Enter Steyn & Steyn Attorneys. When you have a serious complaint you call a specialist.

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

FNB-TPN Residential Property Yield


TPN & FNB have teamed up to produce another piece of the buy-to-let toolkit: Residential Property Yield data.
TPN’s rental data overlaid with FNB’s house price data and Automated Valuation Models (AVM) produces the Residential Yield.
Investors are now able to enjoy the benefits of understanding the Gross National Average Yield; as well as the different yields on Sectional Title vs. Full Title; further categorised by number of bedrooms. Effectively profiling which residential property category works harder for its value.
Click here to read the full report: FNB-TPN Residential Yield

Monday, November 12, 2012

Tenants hold landlords to ransom - hole plugged


At TPN we have a consistent message; place quality tenants to limit the risk of non-payment, damage to property or worse a “squatting” tenant. To this end TPN collects tenant rental payment profile data and adverse / default listings.
 
I find it doubtful any landlord would willing or knowingly place a delinquent tenant without weighing up their options in terms of double or triple deposits, sureties, co-signatories or requiring a signed debit order.

Unfortunately, it has come to light that delinquent tenants are holding property managers and landlords to ransom; demanding that adverse information is removed from the credit bureaus or they refuse to vacate the property. This type of behaviour is not limited to tenants per se and has resulted in a credit industry-wide directive:

The Credit Bureau Association (CBA), of which TPN is a member, issued a policy directive which is now in force:

“It was resolved by the legal and compliance committee of the CBA that adverse consumer credit information supplied by non Credit Provider Association members shall be displayed for the maximum period from the date of event, as prescribed for the said categories of consumer credit information, in terms of regulation 17 of the General Regulations Issued in terms of the National Credit Act No.34 of 2005 (NCA); effective from 1 June 2011.”

National Credit Act
Regulation 17 (1)

Categories of Consumer Credit Information
Description
Maximum period
Adverse classification of consumer behaviour
Subjective classifications of consumer behaviour [Examples: “late payer”, “absconded”, “damage to property”]
1 year
Adverse classification of enforcement action
Classification related to enforcement action taken by the credit provider [Examples: “handed over”, “bad debt written off”, evicted”]
2 year

National Credit Act
Section 70(2)(d)

A registered credit bureau must-
(d) retain any consumer credit information reported to it for the prescribed period, irrespective of whether that information reflects positively or negatively on the consumer;

Conclusion
TPN members are able to load Adverse Listings (defaults) against their customer’s (tenant’s) credit profiles on both the TPN and TransUnion databases. Prior to loading these default listings the TPN member is legally required to give the consumer 20 business days’ notice of intention to list.

Should the consumer settle the debt prior to the 1 or 2 year retention period; the TPN member must update the consumer’s default record to “Account settled in full”.
 
TPN and TransUnion will no longer accept a request to delete defaults unless the default details are factually inaccurate, duplicated or relate to fraud.

Friday, October 26, 2012

eBay vs Rentbay

Our David vs Goliath battle continues!

The BBC World Service interview was a hit: click here to listen to the soundbite

Rentbay does feel special given all the attention; log onto www.rentbay.co.za we can help you list properties and find tenants.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

eBay sues Rentbay

Read all about it on today's front page Business Day article “SA firm fights eBay’s bid to close website.”

Rentbay – TPN’s free property listing website remains online and open for business. We are determined our landlords and property managers / brokers have access to a free listing portal.

I personally manage a handful of my own properties (it’s tough! but necessary for on-going relevance. No ivory tower here!), thanks to Rentbay I found tenants for 2 properties just last week.

Visit Rentbay.co.za you’ll be able to list properties, find properties and that’s all – just properties!

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Feedback from the Estate Agency Affairs Summit

The Department of Human Settlements (DHS) hosted the Estate Agent Industry Summit at Gallagher Estate on the 4th and 5th October. It was pleasing to see over 400 delegates attended ranging from the established franchises, independent offices, auctioneers, IEASA, principals, agents and even unregistered agents.

The summit was opened by Minister Tokyo Sexwale. The tone of the summit was set upfront; day 1 was set aside for raising issues and day 2 was about finding solutions.

The afternoon session on day 1 was split into 4 breakaway groups; each delegate attended one of the below sessions:

• Redefining the role and mandate of the EAAB

• Creating an inclusive and integrated estate agency industry

• Estate agency industry as an economic driver to stimulate growth & development

• Research and development

Day 2 of the summit was a feedback session by the DHS summarizing each of the break away sessions. During the feedback session it became clear there were many overlaps in the group discussions.

For summary purposes I have listed the topic points and feedback received from the various sessions below. It was noted that the industry will need to find a balance between transformation and education while maintaining (improving) professionalism.

Solutions were not necessarily found to all points, but robust discussions took place.

Estate Agents Affairs Board

The role of the EAAB was debated. Should the EAAB represent the Industry or protect the interests of the public. On this point there was clear communication from DHS: the mandate of the EAAB would remain regulator and the Industry should form a national body to represent the estate agents.

The composition of the Board was discussed, should the make-up of the Board remain the same with the addition of other professional bodies such as auctioneers; or was there a need to reduce the number of Board members to those with specific expertise?

The idea of regional EAAB offices was suggested.

The need to enhance the capacity of the EAAB’s inspectorate to enforce compliance.

The EAAB should conduct education and training for both consumer and practitioner.

Fidelity Fund

There is a concern that the fidelity fund is being depleted; it came to light that the fidelity fund is being used where transgressions are made by unregistered estate agents and the fund remains liable to pay claims of unregistered estate agents. Managing agents were highlighted as the other culprit resulting in large claims.

A suggestion was tabled to re-insure the fund or to levy a fee at the deeds office at the point of registration.

Other suggestions included naming and shaming those involved who resulted in a pay-out from the fund; promote consumer awareness with regards to only dealing with registered estate agents or capping the maximum pay-out allowed.

There was need to improve the claim pay-out process as the current 3 month waiting period was far too long.

Unregistered Estate Agents

The deeds office has over 300 compliance points to check prior to a property transfer; the idea of validating the current FFC status / registration of the estate with the EAAB was proposed prior to the transfer to prevent sales by unregistered agents.

The DHS encouraged registered estate agents to “out” their unregistered peers.

Transformation

There is a need to make the industry more inclusive; discussions were held around internships / mentorship programmes and how to make “estate agent” a career path.

Suggestions were made as to transformation enablers:

Career guidance at school’s career days

Inclusion of property ownership in life orientation subject

DHS to fund previously disadvantage (education or a stipend)

Government to make sale / rental / development stock available especially to previously disadvantaged category of estate agents.

Education

There are 40000 registered estate agents (unclear how many are active) vs. less than 1000 agents who have written the PDE exam.

The majority of delegates supported further education but there appeared to be clear frustration with the SSETA, the curriculum (especially as it related to specialist services such as rentals, sectional title, auctioneers and commercial agents) and the difficulty understanding training funding / the subsidy programme.

There was a pressing need to allow for specialised training; example to rental agents and other areas such as finance and admin.

Overall delegates seemed to encourage the NQF 4 and 5 as a minimum requirement and questioned the matric exemption as this was not estate agent specific training. Delegates agreed with the policy of 3 attempts to write and pass the PDE then a 12 month cooling off period if unsuccessful.

Consumer Education

Consumer education was raised in a number of the breakaway discussions; the industries role in changing the negative perception of estate agents in the market by educating consumers (particularly the vulnerable) of their rights.

Suggestions such as an industry standardized “consumer protection disclosure document” were proposed.

Capital Formation

Real estate has the ability to create wealth through home ownership and job creation. There is an untapped market in the predominantly “black” areas but there appears to be a racial bias in terms of the type of title deeds and property valuations in these areas, as well as discrimination by the banks in offering finance.

There is an estimated R1 trillion worth of “dead capital” trapped in these townships as property owners have no certainly of ownership (there are 100 different types of “right to use land” title deeds as opposed to full ownership title deeds in the more affluent areas)

Legislation

The Estate Agents Affairs Act was originally drafted in 1976 and although there have been amendments over the years, it does not take into account the more recent legislations: NCA, CPA, PIE, RHA and the Debt Collectors Act. There is a pressing need to align all the relevant pieces of legislation and ensure agents are well versed in their application.

The definition of an Estate Agent was raised; is there a need to either expand or clarify the definition to include all intermediaries or specialists such as auctioneers?

Estate agents seemed to be confused about which other bodies they needed to be registered with; for example the Council of Debt Collectors.

The application of the various pieces of legislation was not well understood in the industry.

The DHS wanted a better consultation process with more meaningful engagement with industry, including understanding key impediments impacting SMMEs.

A suggestion was made to give the code of conduct legal status.

Municipalities

The vast majority of delegates agreed that the municipalities frustrated the sale process with regards to clearance certificates etc. The DHS committed to engaging with local council in this regard.

Market Facilitations

Concerns were raised regarding the perceived “monopoly” of the market by the more established franchise groups; examples were made of how the banks in their “quick sell” type initiatives would only engage with agents with a national footprint thereby excluding the small businesses.

Questions were raised regarding how to involve small agents in the large scale DHS affordable housing developments given their capacity constraints – DHS brings on a large 50000 unit project but small agents are only able to participate on a much smaller scale and are thereby excluded.

Government holds 25% of property ownership and could deliberately intervene to promote access to stock.

Spatial separation

Urban land is in short supply; there is a need to provide low income households with housing close to work, schools etc.; mixed cost residential areas were on the agenda but research was required to assess the price impact on existing properties. Included in the delegate pack were the:

EAAB 3 year Annual Performance Plan

EAAB 5 year Corporate Strategic Plan

From my perspective, this first step taken by DHS of engaging with the industry to fully understand the frustrations and problems faced by the industry is an encouraging step forward. I found the representatives of DHS to be well prepared and well versed for the summit, given that the EAAB has only fallen under their leadership in May.

I look forward to their continued support in leading the industry through these turbulent times.